The trouble with peace


After the end of the Cold War we had a number of conflicts with the direct participation of NATO countries, wars and “peace missions” that hardly got any real winner. USA and its allies won every battle on the field but how many of this wars gave us a better world?

In Europe we got the dissolution of Yugoslavia, followed by a bitter war and a NATO intervention. From the ashes of a country now we got two nations (Slovenia and Croatia) that has been included in the European Union, a disputed territory (Bosnia Herzegovina) that could break in two any time soon, two failed countries (Kosovo and Macedonia-FYROM) and a nation suspended between hate and need (Serbia). Is this a victory?

In the Middle East we got another failed nation, Iraq. Since the fall of Saddam Hussein and the end of its regime we have a derailed country, roughly split in three by the means of religion or ethnic relevance (Kurds in the North, Sunni and Shiites in the South). No sign of real stabilization is present today, the whole nation is a hunting ground for organized crime cartels and terrorist groups. Is this a victory?

In Asia we got Afghanistan or what’s left of it. They lost their National cohesion in 1979 after the USSR invasion and never recovered. Taliban groups are in control of a good part of the country (roughly 40%), another part in under a number of self-proclaimed war lords. National government is a joke and the opium traffic is stronger than ever. If foreign troops go away this poor excuse for a country will collapse in a matter of weeks. Is this a victory?

In Africa we got Libia, nowadays it’s a complete mess. Muammar Gheddafi was a disgrace for them and for the whole world, no doubt about it, but now nobody is in charge for this country and no easy solution is on the table. Today Libia is a danger zone, ready to fall in the wrong hands if not properly helped. Tribal groups and crime cartels are in control of more than half of this nation. Is this a victory?

In my opinion there’s no such thing as a good war, not since the end of WWII. The main problem here is not how to achieve a military victory and/or to topple some two-bit dictator, what we do not know is how to replace a regime with a democracy. The real mistake is to think that is possible to force a fast transition between different way to conduct a country.

It’s an old lesson that USA and NATO countries never learned. Think about the end of colonialism in Africa in the ’50 and the ’60, think about four decades of interference in Central and South America, think about all the damages done in Asia after the Korean War. No matter how good a system could be modern democracy, it can’t be forced or imposed. It have to be learned, explored, adapted to the local tradition and culture.

Now think about Syria. Maybe we can topple Bashar al-Assad and his cronies in a matter of few months but what will happen after that? How many years of chaos and mayhem? How many refugees? How many deaths? There are no fast solutions available, no easy way out. It’s a waste of precious resources to start a war when you do not know what to do with it.

3 thoughts on “The trouble with peace

  1. My apologies for my bad english.

    Leeroy Jenkins syndrome.
    They go, they fight, only after the battle they think: what are we doing here !?
    We needed a goal?
    What’s it goal?!
    Mr “Cespuglio” and Blair said to the world: Iraq have weapon of mass destruction, we have to go to make the job!
    Job done, but ten years later, we still have not found those weapons, and Iraq isn’t get better.
    So something is changed.
    Now mr Obama and Cameron says: we need go for the Syria, we have the evidence of Assad’s army chemical strike.
    Sorry pal, but the bonus is ended.
    Ed Milliband says: “Britain is learning the lessons of our past, including the lessons of Iraq”.
    GB says NO.
    Many people think like Ed Milliband: we don’t have trust in you.
    Strike Syria isn’t better option, but the worst.

    • UK Parlament set a milestone when blocked Cameron’s initiative to go at war, no matter the evidence (and the cost!). As you say, it’s a matter of trust and we do not believe anymore everything we see on TV. Too many wars with no real end, too many flag-wrapped coffins back home (it’s 53 for Italy in Afghanistan!!!). Time’s up to stand for a better decision, a few missiles can’t solve anything.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.